Groups Similar Look up By Text Browse About



Similar articles
Article Id Title Prob Score Similar Compare
215683 ZDNET 2021-9-10:
US judge rules Apple can't block in-app purchasing
1.000 Find similar Compare side-by-side
216042 ZDNET 2021-9-12:
Epic Games appeals decision made in antitrust lawsuit against Apple
0.628 0.774 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215615 THEVERGE 2021-9-10:
Apple must allow other forms of in-app purchases, rules judge in Epic v. Apple
0.966 0.691 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215635 ARSTECHNICA 2021-9-10:
Major win for Epic Games: Apple has 90 days to open up app store payments
0.896 0.650 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215710 THEVERGE 2021-9-10:
Apple won’t let Epic bring Fortnite back to South Korea’s App Store
0.875 0.637 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215699 THEVERGE 2021-9-9:
Epic tests Apple with new request: let us relaunch Fortnite in Korea
0.261 0.578 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215808 ZDNET 2021-9-10:
Epic requests for Fortnite to re-enter App Store with its payment systems in Korea
0.653 0.576 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215628 THEVERGE 2021-9-10:
Epic v. Apple judge rules Fortnite’s Peely can appear naked in court
0.183 0.508 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215377 THEVERGE 2021-9-8:
Apple refuses to make NDA concessions for workplace harassment and discrimination
0.412 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215639 THEVERGE 2021-9-9:
Apple fires senior engineering program manager Ashley Gjøvik for allegedly leaking information
0.373 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215856 ARSTECHNICA 2021-9-13:
Apple fixes security vulnerabilities in new versions of iOS, macOS, and watchOS
0.352 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215392 THEVERGE 2021-9-7:
Apple’s iPhone 13 event will take place on September 14th
0.352 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215533 TECHREPUBLIC 2021-9-7:
Don't be a Platform Pig: Build a platform that works for everyone
0.348 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215755 ZDNET 2021-9-8:
Apple releases iOS 15 teaser
0.344 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215719 THEVERGE 2021-9-10:
Apple Music is adding more DJ mixes with new features powered by Shazam
0.344 Find similar Compare side-by-side
216079 ZDNET 2021-9-13:
This is how a cybersecurity researcher accidentally broke Apple Shortcuts
0.336 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215475 ARSTECHNICA 2021-9-7:
California streaming: Apple’s next big event is on September 14
0.328 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215709 ARSTECHNICA 2021-9-9:
Infosec researchers say Apple’s bug-bounty program needs work
0.297 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215530 TECHREPUBLIC 2021-9-7:
How to control activity tracking by apps on your iPhone or iPad
0.280 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215610 ZDNET 2021-9-7:
Ford Motor poaches key auto exec from Apple
0.279 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215521 ZDNET 2021-9-7:
iPhone 13 invites are out: What to expect, how to watch the Sept. 14 event
0.278 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215385 TECHREPUBLIC 2021-9-7:
Apple's Sept. 14 event: What to expect and how to watch it
0.260 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215723 ZDNET 2021-9-9:
Sell your old iPhone safely by following these steps
0.253 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215444 THEVERGE 2021-9-7:
Apple’s car chief is heading to Ford
0.250 Find similar Compare side-by-side
215727 THEVERGE 2021-9-10:
Apple reportedly overcomes Watch Series 7 manufacturing issues
0.226 Find similar Compare side-by-side

1

ID: 215683

URL: https://www.zdnet.com/article/us-judge-rules-apple-cant-block-in-app-purchasing/

Date: 2021-09-10

US judge rules Apple can't block in-app purchasing

In a mixed verdict in the Epic-Apple case, the judge also ruled that Apple is not a monopolist: "Success is not illegal." In a mixed verdict in the high-profile court battle between Epic Games and Apple, a federal judge on Friday ruled that Apple can't block third-party developers from adding in-app purchasing mechanisms to iOS apps. At the same time, the judge ruled that Apple has not violated state or federal antitrust laws.  "Success is not illegal," US District Judge Yvonne Gonzales Rogers wrote. While the judge ruled that Apple is an antitrust monopolist, she did find that Apple is engaging in anticompetitive conduct under California's competition laws. Consequently, she issued the injunction blocking Apple's App Store rules. In addition to addressing in-app purchases, the injunction says Apple can't stop developers from communicating with customers via contact information that customers voluntarily submit when they set up an account within an app. The permanent injunction goes into effect in 90 days. " The Court concludes that Apple's anti-steering provisions hide critical information from consumers and illegally stifle consumer choice," Gonzales Rogers wrote. "When coupled with Apple's incipient antitrust violations, these anti-steering provisions are anticompetitive and a nationwide remedy to eliminate those provisions is warranted." Epic Games filed suit against Apple after the tech giant kicked Epic's game Fortnite off the App Store. Epic was booted from the App Store after it implemented a direct payment system for in-game currency in Fortnite, bypassing the 30 percent fee that Apple charged developers. Epic charges that Apple's actions violated antitrust laws. The Apple-Epic case began in May, in the US District Court in the Northern District of California. Apple CEO Tim Cook testified in court for the first time during the trial, and a series of other Apple executives also took the stand.   Gonzales Rogers ruled that Apple is entitled damages from Epic Games for breach of contract. Epic will have to pay damages in an amount equal to 30% of the more than $12 million in revenue Epic Games collected from users in the Fortnite app on iOS via Epic Direct Payment between August and October 2020. Additionally, it has to pay 30% of any such revenue Epic Games collected from November 2020 through the date of judgment.  Apple was justified in terminating its Developer Program License Agreement with Epic Games, the judge said. Before concluding that Apple is not a monopolist, the judge said she disagreed with both parties' definition of the relevant market.  "Ultimately, after evaluating the trial evidence, the Court finds that the relevant market here is digital mobile gaming transactions, not gaming generally and not Apple's own internal operating systems related to the App Store," she wrote. "The mobile gaming market itself is a $100 billion industry. The size of this market explains Epic Games' motive in bringing this action. Having penetrated all other video game markets, the mobile gaming market was Epic Games' next target and it views Apple as an impediment."