Groups Similar Look up By Text Browse About

Similar articles
Article Id Title Prob Score Similar Compare
209205 ARSTECHNICA 2021-6-2:
SEC struggling to rein in Elon Musk’s tweets, letters reveal
1.000 Find similar Compare side-by-side
208973 THEVERGE 2021-6-1:
Yes, the SEC has noticed Elon Musk’s Tesla stock price tweet
0.907 0.734 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209005 THEVERGE 2021-6-2:
Elon Musk blames ‘supply chain price pressure’ for Tesla’s increasing prices
0.403 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209111 ZDNET 2021-6-1:
SEC charges US promoters for marketing alleged BitConnect cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme
0.224 Find similar Compare side-by-side
208980 THEVERGE 2021-6-1:
Twitter is once again taking your requests for a blue verification badge
0.186 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209614 ZDNET 2021-6-4:
Minister apologises after NDIA shared details of a victim with her perpetrator
0.185 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209287 THEVERGE 2021-6-4:
The tiny Playdate handheld gets a price bump but double the games
0.184 Find similar Compare side-by-side
208944 ARSTECHNICA 2021-6-2:
After months of drama, Minecraft speedrunner Dream admits he used mods
0.171 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209049 THEVERGE 2021-6-2:
Donald Trump has shut down his blog
0.170 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209100 VENTUREBEAT 2021-5-30:
Randy Pitchford: Creating LGBTQ+ understanding through games
0.167 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209338 ZDNET 2021-6-2: stock drops on fiscal Q4 beat, in-line revenue view
0.167 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209148 ZDNET 2021-6-1:
Cloudera to be acquired, turned private by CD&R, KKR in $5.3 billion deal
0.166 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209065 ARSTECHNICA 2021-6-1:
Big Tech sues Florida, saying social media law violates First Amendment
0.163 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209474 ARSTECHNICA 2021-6-5:
“Kind of crazy”—how the booming US used car market is driving inflation
0.162 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209187 THEVERGE 2021-6-4:
T-Mobile employee files suit after HR asked invasive questions about her OnlyFans account
0.162 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209235 ARSTECHNICA 2021-6-3:
This Range Rover Classic restomod runs on Tesla power
0.160 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209027 ARSTECHNICA 2021-5-31:
Building a better edible
0.157 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209054 ARSTECHNICA 2021-6-1:
After 75,000 Echo arbitration demands, Amazon now lets you sue it
0.157 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209460 ARSTECHNICA 2021-6-4:
Puppies’ ability to communicate with people is present almost from birth
0.156 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209113 ZDNET 2021-6-1:
Asian cybercrime takedown leads to intercept of $83 million in financial theft
0.156 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209050 ARSTECHNICA 2021-6-1:
ROM site owner made $30,000 a year—now owes Nintendo $2.1M
0.155 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209351 ZDNET 2021-6-3:
Cisco's Webex fails to read the room and I just want to cry
0.155 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209096 TECHREPUBLIC 2021-6-1:
Foundries are raking in big bucks and record revenue amid global chip shortage
0.153 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209260 THEVERGE 2021-6-3:
Facebook to end special treatment for politicians after Trump ban
0.153 Find similar Compare side-by-side
209225 THEVERGE 2021-6-3:
Google announces $99 Pixel Buds A-Series
0.151 Find similar Compare side-by-side


ID: 209205


Date: 2021-06-02

SEC struggling to rein in Elon Musk’s tweets, letters reveal

Regulator concerned that Tesla's lawyers were not reviewing CEO's tweets. The Securities and Exchange Commission is having a hard time reining in Elon Musks social media use, according to a new report from The Wall Street Journal. The regulator sent Tesla three sternly worded letters between August 2019 and June 2020, asking Teslas attorneys to enforce a 2018 settlement that demanded greater oversight of Musks social media posts. Tesla has abdicated the duties required of it by the courts order, said the SEC in a letter from May of last year. The three letters, including the SECs records of its correspondence with Teslas attorneys, were obtained by the Journal through a Freedom of Information Act request. They show a regulator struggling to enforce a settlement that, from the outset, seemed challenging to implement. The brouhaha began when Musk sent his infamous funding secured tweet. In August 2018, Musk announced that he would be taking Tesla private at $420 per share. That sent the companys stock soaring, only to see it plummet when funding turned out to not, in fact, be secured. Investors complained en masse to the SEC about the stunt. The regulator investigated the matter and first attempted to settle things with Musk and Tesla. Musk balked, so the SEC sued. But that wasnt all. The SEC also stipulated another condition in the settlement: Tesla would have to implement controls and procedures to oversee Musks communications. Musk would have to seek approval for tweets that contain or could contain material information —basically anything that could affect Teslas stock price. From the beginning, it was clear that Musk had his own interpretation of the settlement terms. Less than five months after the settlement, Musk tweeted that Tesla will make around 500k in 2019. He later clarified that he meant an annualized production rate of 500,000 cars. He didnt clear either statement with Tesla lawyers, so the SEC took him to court, asking that he be held in contempt. Well, it turns out the new settlement didnt change much. Just over three months later, Musk tweeted about a Tesla energy product. Spooling up production line rapidly. Hoping to manufacture ~1000 solar roofs/week by end of this year. The tweet clearly mentioned production and delivery numbers, the SEC wrote in a letter, which was verboten. Teslas lawyers replied that it didnt matter because Musks tweet was wholly aspirational, according to SEC records of its correspondence with the company. Musk poked the SEC again on May 1, 2020, when he tweeted, Teslas stock price is too high imo. The SEC again wrote a letter, to which Tesla replied that the tweet didnt need approval because it was just a personal opinion. By this point, the SECs correspondence notes make clear that the regulators were losing patience. They asked Tesla for records related to the stock price tweet, and Teslas lawyers revealed that they had none. The SEC wrote back, saying, In the face of Mr. Musks repeated refusals to submit his covered written communications on Twitter to Tesla for pre-approval, we are very concerned by Teslas repeated determinations that there have been no policy violations because of purported carve-outs. Teslas attorneys replied that tweeting about the companys stock price wasnt covered under the new settlement—and that they thought the regulator was out to harass Musk. The serial nature of these investigations leaves us gravely concerned that the SEC is targeting Mr. Musk for an improper purpose, they wrote. In the final letter the WSJ obtained, the SEC asked Tesla to reconsider its positions in this matter by acting to implement and enforce disclosure controls and procedures. The SECs frustrations arent surprising. Social media use has upended the way people communicate around the world, throwing a new element of chaos into what had been routine discourse. In many ways, the bigger surprise was that the situation took so long to bleed into the world of business. To see how social media has amplified some voices and their influence to nearly unprecedented heights, look no further than todays spike in the share price for Samsung Publishing. The company, which is not related to the Samsung conglomerate, soared more than 10 percent during trading hours today. The cause? Elon Musk, of course, who tweeted an observation about the viral nature of the kids song Baby Shark. Baby Shark crushes all! More views than humans, Musk tweeted. Samsung Publishing owns the company that produced a Baby Shark music video.