Groups Similar Look up By Text Browse About



Similar articles
Article Id Title Prob Score Similar Compare
201226 ARSTECHNICA 2021-2-18:
Tech groups sue Maryland to block new digital-ad tax from going into effect
1.000 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201134 THEVERGE 2021-2-18:
Tech groups are suing to halt Maryland’s new digital services tax
0.979 0.679 Find similar Compare side-by-side
200961 VENTUREBEAT 2021-2-17:
Boast.ai secures $100 million to help startups claim R&D tax credits
0.018 0.395 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201155 ZDNET 2021-2-19:
Best tax software in 2021
0.021 0.379 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201137 TECHREPUBLIC 2021-2-19:
IRS issues urgent notice on scams aimed at tax professionals
0.337 Find similar Compare side-by-side
200937 ARSTECHNICA 2021-2-16:
North Dakota lawmakers jump into Apple/Epic fight with new app store bill
0.328 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201055 ZDNET 2021-2-16:
Automating scam call blocking sees Telstra prevent up to 500,000 calls a day
0.327 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201193 ARSTECHNICA 2021-2-18:
House Republicans propose nationwide ban on municipal broadband networks
0.314 Find similar Compare side-by-side
200925 ZDNET 2021-2-17:
Online sales and cost saving strategy sees Coles net profit jump 14% during 1H21
0.300 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201279 ZDNET 2021-2-17:
Cloud communications firm Sinch nabs Inteliquent for $1.14B
0.293 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201054 ZDNET 2021-2-15:
Reckon to sell off ReckonDocs to fund cloud strategy and reduce debt
0.278 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201252 ZDNET 2021-2-18:
Walmart Q4: Digital sales remain strong, operating costs climb, wage increases on deck
0.269 Find similar Compare side-by-side
200762 THEVERGE 2021-2-16:
Apple won’t have to allow App Store alternatives on iOS after North Dakota bill fails
0.264 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201296 ZDNET 2021-2-18:
Private firms can't protect us from digital attacks. Government must step in.
0.256 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201272 ZDNET 2021-2-18:
Data#3 gains uplift in 1H21 thanks to public cloud demand and ongoing contracts
0.254 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201080 ZDNET 2021-2-17:
Aussie Broadband sees first half revenue almost double to AU$157 million
0.253 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201265 ZDNET 2021-2-17:
Twilio delivers strong Q4 results, revenue climbs 65%
0.251 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201655 ZDNET 2021-2-22:
Palo Alto Networks Q2 results beat estimates
0.250 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201606 ZDNET 2021-2-22:
Chorus attributes half-year profit drop to COVID impact on network migrations
0.249 Find similar Compare side-by-side
200883 ZDNET 2021-2-17:
Wix Q4 2020: Strong subscription growth boosts revenue streams
0.249 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201308 ZDNET 2021-2-18:
Dropbox tops Q4 expectations as ARR surpasses $2 billion
0.249 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201057 ZDNET 2021-2-16:
Myanmar's proposed cybersecurity Bill draws wide condemnation
0.248 Find similar Compare side-by-side
200878 ZDNET 2021-2-17:
Shopify preps 2021 investments, sees more normalized growth amid COVID-19 vaccinations
0.247 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201076 ZDNET 2021-2-16:
Cornerstone OnDemand crushes Q4 expectations
0.244 Find similar Compare side-by-side
201306 ZDNET 2021-2-18:
Arista shares soar as Q4 revenue, EPS top expectations, forecast higher as well
0.242 Find similar Compare side-by-side

1

ID: 201226

URL: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/02/tech-groups-sue-maryland-to-block-new-digital-ad-tax-from-going-into-effect/

Date: 2021-02-18

Tech groups sue Maryland to block new digital-ad tax from going into effect

The countdown to lawsuit o'clock basically started the second legislators voted. A group of business organizations led by the US Chamber of Commerce is suing the state of Maryland, seeking to block the implementation of the state's brand-new, first-of-its-kind tax on digital-advertising revenue. Maryland's tax bill is "deeply flawed" and "illegal in myriad ways," the suit ( PDF) alleges, claiming that act will "harm Marylanders and small businesses and reduce the overall quality of Internet content." "This is a case of legislative overreach, punishing an industry that supports over one hundred thousand jobs in Maryland and contributes tens of billions of dollars to its economy each year," the Internet Association, one of the plaintiffs, said in a statement about the suit. " Internet services and companies are proud to play a role in creating opportunities for Marylands small businesses and citizens. " Maryland's Digital Advertising Gross Revenues Tax does what it sounds like: it imposes a tax on the gross revenues companies make from digital advertising inside Maryland. Digital-advertising services, as defined in the bill, include "advertisements in the form of banner advertising, search advertising, interstitial advertising, and other comparable advertising services." Businesses that make less than $100 million in a calendar year from global digital-advertising revenues are exempt from the tax, after which it scales up. Businesses with global annual gross advertising revenues higher than $100 million, up to $1 billion, owe 2.5 percent. For businesses between $1 billion and $5 billion, it's 5 percent, then 7.5 percent for businesses with global revenue up to $15 billion, and 10 percent for anything larger than that. The Act uses global revenue to calculate what tax bracket a company falls into, but it specifically only imposes that tax on digital advertising in Maryland, aimed at Marylanders. If 2 percent of a company's US digital ad revenue in 2021 comes from advertising in Maryland, then the company would owe tax on just that 2 percent. Lawmakers in the Old Line State first approved the bill back in May, but Republican Gov. Larry Hogan vetoed it. Both chambers of the state legislature voted last week in favor of overriding the veto and implementing the law. Several Maryland businesses joined with large trade groups last year to launch a coalition, Marylanders for Tax Fairness, to lobby against the tax. The major groups representing almost all of the large US tech firms—including the Internet Association, the IAB, the NCTA, and TechNet—are among the coalition's membership. The coalition in a statement last week all but promised to sue when the legislature overrode Hogan's veto on the bill, and three of its members, plus another organization, are now making good on that threat. The bill is not actually a tax but is instead a "punitive fee, penalty, or fine" under US law, the trade groups argue in the suit. Because of the revenue-based scale, the Act targets "extra-territorial conduct," i.e., behavior outside the state of Maryland, and "is a highly unusual and extraordinarily severe form of exaction." Additionally, the plaintiffs argue, the tax violates the Internet Tax Freedom Act. Congress first passed the ITFA in 1998 and subsequently renewed it several times before President Barack Obama signed a permanent extension of the bill into law in 2016. The ITFA is designed to stop states from taxing Internet-access services, which looked in the 1990s like they might be about to become a new potential line of state revenue. In short, your state, county, or city cannot impose a 5 percent tax on your monthly Comcast or Verizon bill. A handful of states had enacted such taxes prior to the 1998 law but were required to phase those taxes out by 2020. The ITFA does not prohibit other sales and use taxes related to transactions that take place over the Internet, which is why most of us pay sales tax on our online orders by now. What will be left to the court to determine is if the ad sales tax is discriminatory because the bill does not include other advertisers, such as print and television, and instead only includes online ads.