Groups Similar Look up By Text Browse About

Similar articles
Article Id Title Prob Score Similar Compare
186746 ARSTECHNICA 2020-7-30:
“This is a very dangerous situation”: Big Tech’s day on the Hill
1.000 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186548 THEVERGE 2020-7-29:
Everything you need to know from the tech antitrust hearing
0.709 0.578 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186950 VENTUREBEAT 2020-8-1:
Antitrust experts weigh in on breaking up Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google
0.154 0.577 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186689 VENTUREBEAT 2020-7-29:
Antitrust hearing: Amazon, Facebook, and Google were questioned 2x more than Apple
0.327 0.556 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186433 THEVERGE 2020-7-28:
Big Tech is going on trial
0.112 0.528 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186450 VENTUREBEAT 2020-7-29:
Tech CEOs will survive antitrust hearings but can’t stop investigations
0.324 0.521 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186541 THEVERGE 2020-7-29:
How the CEOs of Apple, Google, Amazon, and Facebook plan to defend Big Tech today
0.308 0.521 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186830 ARSTECHNICA 2020-8-3:
ProtonMail founder: Apple uses monopoly to “hold all of us hostage”
0.520 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186679 VENTUREBEAT 2020-7-29:
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos ‘can’t guarantee’ policy against using seller specific data hasn’t been violated
0.219 0.494 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186445 THENEXTWEB 2020-7-29:
How to watch today’s antitrust hearing against Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google
0.292 0.471 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186713 THEVERGE 2020-7-31:
TikTok has a bold new plan to win over regulators
0.140 0.452 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186727 ARSTECHNICA 2020-7-30:
Telegram files EU antitrust complaint against Apple’s App Store
0.006 0.422 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186667 THEVERGE 2020-7-30:
In the pandemic economy, tech companies are raking it in
0.385 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186503 THEVERGE 2020-7-29:
How another video of COVID-19 misinformation went viral on Facebook
0.350 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186423 THEVERGE 2020-7-29:
How to watch today’s tech antitrust hearing
0.349 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186754 THENEXTWEB 2020-7-30:
TikTok’s CEO takes shots at Zuckerberg as it aims to continue to survive in the US
0.329 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186941 ARSTECHNICA 2020-8-3:
In wake of Apple acquisition, Dark Sky ends Android support
0.314 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186753 VENTUREBEAT 2020-7-30:
Huawei has the same app problem that doomed Windows Phone
0.312 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186523 THEVERGE 2020-7-29:
TikTok is opening up its algorithm and challenging competitors to do the same
0.305 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186482 THEVERGE 2020-7-28:
Democrats want a truce with Section 230 supporters
0.291 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186448 THENEXTWEB 2020-7-29:
Why you need Design Thinking and Proofs of Concept to level up your business
0.283 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186737 THEVERGE 2020-7-31:
Vergecast: the Big Tech antitrust hearing episode
0.282 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186550 THEVERGE 2020-7-29:
‘Instagram can hurt us’: Mark Zuckerberg emails outline plan to neutralize competitors
0.281 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186744 ARSTECHNICA 2020-7-30:
Emails detail Amazon’s plan to crush a startup rival with price cuts
0.279 Find similar Compare side-by-side
186440 THENEXTWEB 2020-7-29:
Most mobile apps suck — here’s how to fix them
0.274 Find similar Compare side-by-side


ID: 186746


Date: 2020-07-30

“This is a very dangerous situation”: Big Tech’s day on the Hill

Marathon session was nearly two different hearings, depending on party of questioner. A bevy of tech's biggest titans—Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Apple CEO Tim Cook, and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg —all took to their remote offices Wednesday to dial into a hotly anticipated Congressional hearing, the latest part of an in-depth investigation into their firms' behavior that began more than a year ago. The almost six-hour hearing was nominally convened to talk about antitrust enforcement, and it had two core questions at its heart. First: do the biggest, globe-spanning US tech companies have too much power in the market? And second: did they come by the power they do have honestly, or did they somehow cheat to get it? House Antitrust Subcommittee Chairman Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) focused his opening remarks on how bipartisan the investigation process has been to date before sketching out his belief that all four companies present have behaved anticompetitively, become monopolies, and caused harm both to consumers and the entire democratic project writ large. "When everyday Americans learn how much of their data is being mined, they can't run away fast enough," Cicilline said. "But in many cases, there is no escape from the surveillance, because there is no alternative. People are stuck with bad options. "As gatekeepers of the digital economy, these platforms enjoy the power to determine winners and losers, to shake down small businesses and enrich themselves while choking off competitors," said Cicilline. "Their ability to dictate terms, call the shots, upend entire sectors, and inspire fear represents the powers of a private government. Our founders would not bow before a king, nor should we bow before the emperors of the online economy." "Being big is not inherently bad," Ranking Member Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.) added in his opening remarks, but the platforms can still have deleterious effects on the marketplace. " My colleagues and I have a great interest in what your companies do with [their] accumulated power. "Conservatives are consumers, too, and they need the protection of the antitrust laws," Sensenbrenner said, hinting at the argument most of his Republican colleagues would later make. "The power to influence debate carries with it remarkable responsibilities, so let the facts be our guide here. Your companies are large; that's not a problem. Your companies are successful; that's not a problem, either. But I want to leave here with a more complete picture of how your companies use their size, success, and power and what it means to the American consumer." All four CEOs in their opening statements ( Apple, Amazon, Facebook, Google) strived to position themselves as plucky American success stories, job creators, drivers of economic success, and necessary alternatives to China, but they also argued their companies face intense competition on all sides. Both the lawmakers and the witnesses stayed roughly on topic to begin with. But once the question-time portion of the festivities began, suddenly everyone had a pet issue to dig into. Democrats by and large tended to focus on issues related to competition, while Republicans zeroed in on alleged bias, leading the proceeding to feel almost like two overlapping hearings struggling to occupy the same moment in space-time. Last year, as the antitrust investigation ramped up, the subcommittee requested decades' worth of internal documents from all four companies. Damning passages from those documents took center stage as the lawmakers challenged the CEOs about competition—and the lawmakers brought receipts. During questioning, members of the committee zeroed in on the ways the four companies have been accused of stifling other businesses in the space. " Over 85 percent of all online searches go through Google," Cicilline said to Pichai, as soon as questioning started. " Numerous businesses told us that Google steals their content and privileges its own sites in ways that profit Google but crush everyone else... Did Google ever use its surveillance over Web traffic to identify competitive threats? " Pichai tried to dodge the question, responding, "Just like other businesses, we try to understand trends from data, which we can see, and we use it to improve our products for users." Later, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) returned to press the issue harder, to which Pichai again hedged, "Just like other businesses, we try to understand trends from, you know, data, which we can see, and we use it to improve our products for users." Apple, too, faced accusations that it could leverage its data against potential competition. Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) took Cook to task over the walled garden of the App Store and challenged Apple's ability to play gatekeeper and gather app distribution data even though its own first-party apps compete against third-party App Store offerings. "With over 100 million iPhone users in the United States alone, and with Apple's ownership of the App Store giving Apple the ability to control which apps are allowed to be marketed to Apple users, you hold immense power over small businesses to grow and prosper," Johnson said. The rules of the store can be opaque and are " arbitrarily enforced," he went on, and iOS app developers have no choice but to roll with it. " Does Apple not treat all app developers equally?" "We treat every developer the same," Cook replied. "We have open and transparent rules." The committee, however, obtained emails showing that Apple agreed to halve its fee for revenue generated through Amazon's apps. Apple likewise waives its cut for certain streaming video services in exchange for those developers agreeing to integrate certain Apple features into their apps. "What's to stop Apple from increasing its commission to 50 percent?" Johnson asked. "We have never increased commissions in the store since the first day it operated," Cook responded, denying that there was no mechanism for preventing it. " There is a competition for developers just as there is a competition for customers. They could develop their app for Android or Windows or Xbox or Playstation... so competitive I would describe it as a street fight for market share in the smartphone business. " Several members pressed Amazon about its use of data generated by third-party merchants who use its marketplace as a selling platform. "You've referred to third-party sellers today as Amazon's 'partners' and said that your success depends on their success," Rep. Lucy McBath (D-Ga.) said to Bezos. " But over the past year, we've heard a completely different story. " Small-business owners that spoke with the committee members described their relationship with Amazon using words such as "bullying," "fear," and "panic," McBath went on, before she played back a recording of a bookseller whose Amazon marketplace business was allegedly delisted in 2019 in retaliation for becoming too large. Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) echoed the charge. "You have access to data that your competitors do not have, so you might allow third-party sellers onto your platform," she explained to Bezos. " But if you are continuously monitoring the data to make sure that they're never going to get big enough that they can compete with you, that is actually the concern that the committee has." Jayapal concluded: The whole goal of this committee's work is to make sure that there are more Amazons, that there are more Apples, that there are more companies that get to innovate and small businesses that get to thrive, and that is what we're trying to get at—that is why we need to regulate these marketplaces —so that no company has a platform so dominant that it is essentially a monopoly.