Groups Similar Look up By Text Browse About



Similar articles
Article Id Title Prob Score Similar Compare
182175 ARSTECHNICA 2020-5-20:
Intel’s new i9-10900K—fast, yes; competitive, not so much
1.000 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182218 VENTUREBEAT 2020-5-20:
The Core i9-10900K reveals why Intel still matters
0.982 0.665 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182223 ARSTECHNICA 2020-5-19:
AMD’s powerful Ryzen 9 3900X CPU is down to its lowest Amazon price to date
0.386 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182418 ARSTECHNICA 2020-5-22:
Intel acquires Rivet, maker of Killer Wireless-AC gaming Wi-Fi gear
0.355 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181460 ARSTECHNICA 2020-5-18:
ZFS versus RAID: Eight Ironwolf disks, two filesystems, one winner
0.333 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182231 ARSTECHNICA 2020-5-19:
Dell launched sweeping update of its Latitude, Precision business laptop lines
0.308 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182355 VENTUREBEAT 2020-5-21:
Razer Blade Pro 17 features 300Hz screen and 8-core Intel processor
0.295 Find similar Compare side-by-side
183113 TECHCRUNCH 2020-5-21:
Enjoy some 4K TV with your nature on Samsung’s new outdoor sets
0.259 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182207 ARSTECHNICA 2020-5-19:
Linux distro review: Fedora Workstation 32
0.255 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182269 VENTUREBEAT 2020-5-19:
The AI Show: How Intel built a chip with a sense of smell
0.244 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182259 ARSTECHNICA 2020-5-21:
Razer’s Blade Pro 17 sports a 300Hz display, Nvidia RTX Super GPUs
0.241 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182202 ARSTECHNICA 2020-5-20:
Samsung improves read/write speeds in its biz-card-sized SSDs with the new T7
0.241 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182193 ARSTECHNICA 2020-5-20:
The electric 2020 Mini Cooper SE: Big driving fun, little driving range
0.217 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182399 TECHREPUBLIC 2020-5-22:
Graduation Gift Guide: Cool gifts for college and high school grads
0.217 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181598 ARSTECHNICA 2020-5-18:
3 different countries, 1 result: Stay-at-home orders work
0.208 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182353 VENTUREBEAT 2020-5-21:
CBD Gummies U.K. — 5 Best CBD Gummy Products in 2020
0.205 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182327 TECHREPUBLIC 2020-5-19:
Dell prioritizes remote workers with new Latitude, Precision, and Optiplex devices
0.202 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182321 VENTUREBEAT 2020-5-19:
OpenAI’s supercomputer collaboration with Microsoft marks its biggest bet yet on AGI
0.202 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181548 TECHREPUBLIC 2020-5-18:
"Back to Work Accelerator" brings monitoring solutions to the office during pandemic
0.199 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181476 TECHREPUBLIC 2020-5-18:
Desktop Linux: Why open source is heading for a new breakthrough
0.199 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181565 THENEXTWEB 2020-5-18:
Why the math behind the UK’s ‘COVID alert levels’ makes no sense
0.198 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182493 VENTUREBEAT 2020-5-22:
For work from home, technology’s convenience matters more than its power
0.198 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181586 VENTUREBEAT 2020-5-18:
Colt Defense LLC Announces Expiration and Results of Tender Offer for 8.00% Fourth Priority Secured Notes Due 2021 and Related Consent Solicitation
0.197 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182962 TECHCRUNCH 2020-5-19:
Xilinx launches a new reconfigurable space-grade chip optimized for local machine learning on orbit
0.197 Find similar Compare side-by-side
183078 TECHCRUNCH 2020-5-21:
Automattic pumps $4.6M into New Vector to help grow Matrix, an open, decentralized comms ecosystem
0.196 Find similar Compare side-by-side

1

ID: 182175

URL: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/05/intels-new-i9-10900k-fast-yes-competitive-not-so-much/

Date: 2020-05-20

Intel’s new i9-10900K—fast, yes; competitive, not so much

The i9-10900K's numbers are better than Intel's lackluster PR led us to expect. The more troubling thing for Team Blue is that it isn't only competing with its own CPUs. Intel's real competition isn't itself, it's AMD—and for now at least, the company is still struggling to keep its head above water. Intel's new flagship i9 desktop CPU is, as you would expect, very fast indeed. Also as you would expect, for the most part its Ryzen 9 3950X equivalent kicks sand in its face and runs away laughing. What we definitely did not expect, given Intel's lackluster marketing around the chip, is how well it stacks up against its own predecessor. Although the version of the promised "up to 5.3GHz" that we saw was only 5.1GHz, the i9-10900K still represents a very healthy 34-percent generation-on-generation improvement versus last year's i9-9900K in all-threaded Cinebench R20 testing. The comparison to Ryzen 9 3950X probably won't surprise any Ars regulars— Intel gets its butt handed to it, and none too politely, in any multithreaded benchmark. On the other hand, Intel ekes out a win—albeit a very narrow one—on the single-threaded version of the Cinebench R20 workload. There really isn't much to choose from in single-threaded Cinebench, which—while a somewhat specific and narrow model —is probably the most appropriate general-purpose model for single-threaded gaming performance. If you want to take the single-threaded crown home, the i9-10900K is your processor. We're just not at all certain it's worth handwaving away a crushing disparity on multithreaded performance to take this one very narrow win. Passmark CPUinfo, HWinfo64, and Intel's own XTU agreed on one thing— our i9-10900K never broke 5.12GHz on any core. This rate matches the expected single-core Turbo speed but falls short of the "up to" promises we saw for Turbo Boost Max and Thermal Velocity Boost — each of which were supposed to give us another 100MHz boost, for a total "up to" of 5.3GHz, for as long as thermal reality permitted it. With an open-air rig paired with an NZXT Kraken fluid cooler and 280mm radiator, we don't think many users will be doing better than we did on the thermal capacity. So we reached out to our Intel contacts. The Intel Performance Maximizer software isn't available for the i9-10900K yet— but we shouldn't have needed it. The Intel Extreme Tuning Utility (XTU) was available but unhelpful—any attempt to mess with the clock multiplier resulted in an immediately unstable system. Bumping the base clock rate cautiously increased the base speeds but did nothing to improve the maximum speed achieved, and it didn't help our benchmark scores, either. None of this is likely to matter much. Intel was willing to share its own internal Cinebench R20 test scores with us—ours were a little better than Intel's on multithreaded, and they were a little worse than the company's on single-threaded. We suspect the multithreaded win on our end is due to our NZXT Kraken cooler, and the single-threaded win on Intel's is a luck-of-the-draw better individual CPU out of the bin. These things happen. Also under the category of "these things happen"—the particular i9-10900K unit we got has a mildly defective UHD 630 integrated GPU. The system is entirely stable doing any normal task or while stress testing the absolute crap out of the CPU for hours on end—but roughly 10 minutes into any GPU stress-testing benchmark, the system locks up. We would like to emphasize that there's no reason to assume a problem in the entire i9-10900 line because of this—flawed CPUs are fairly rare, but they do happen; if this were a retail purchase, it would have just gone back to Intel under warranty. When it comes to heat generation and power consumption, the i9-10900K isn't exactly parsimonious— but it's no Threadripper, either. Our test system desktop-idled at 70W at the wall and maxed out at 336W during benchmarking. While this is at-the-wall power, it corresponds pretty well with what we expected—somewhere in the neighborhood of 270W+ at the CPU under full, sustained load. This is, of course, noticeably higher than Intel's specified 125W TDP—but by now we all know better than to think you're going to get maximum performance out of an Intel CPU running at only its specified TDP, which is sufficient for all-core base clock only. The good news is, although the i9-10900K drinks more power than either its i9-9900K predecessor or its closest competitor—Ryzen 9 3950X, with a 105W TDP and an all-core, full-power draw of roughly 145W — it's still no Threadripper. The Kraken never had to go into leafblower mode to keep the i9-10900K cool — so, with the right cooler, it's at least possible to comfortably share a small office with it. The i9-10900K is on the high end of the "what we expected" range. It's a very significant year-on-year improvement from last year's i9-9900K, with—to our surprise—a larger all-cores than single-core performance increase. Unfortunately, it still can't compete well with its Team Red competition —AMD's Ryzen 9 3950x came out first, consumes less power, drastically outperforms it in multithreaded workloads, and is only 3.0 percent slower on a single-threaded Cinebench R20 test. If the i9-10900K were a drop-in replacement for earlier i7 and i9 rigs, its strong year-on-year performance boost might be worth saving the money on a new motherboard and just plopping the new CPU into an existing rig. Unfortunately, that's not the case—even if you're running an i9-9900K, you're going to need a whole new motherboard for the i9-10900K, at a bare minimum—at which point, you might as well just go ahead and buy Ryzen.