Groups Similar Look up By Text Browse About

Similar articles
Article Id Title Prob Score Similar Compare
182127 TECHCRUNCH 2020-5-18:
U.S. House approves remote voting, though the tech is unclear
1.000 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181604 ARSTECHNICA 2020-5-18:
Members of Congress can vote from home for now—but not by using tech
0.841 0.686 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182987 TECHCRUNCH 2020-5-19:
Decrypted: No warrants for web data, UK grid cyberattack, CyberArk buys Idaptive
0.344 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181464 VENTUREBEAT 2020-5-18:
How Congress is shaping data privacy laws during the pandemic
0.303 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181459 THEVERGE 2020-5-18:
Square announces permanent work-from-home policy
0.288 Find similar Compare side-by-side
183016 TECHCRUNCH 2020-5-19:
GitLab’s head of Remote on hiring, onboarding and why Slack is a no-work zone
0.273 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181573 VENTUREBEAT 2020-5-17:
4 things this CEO didn’t expect about remote work life
0.270 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182101 TECHCRUNCH 2020-5-16:
The real threat of fake voices in a time of crisis
0.268 Find similar Compare side-by-side
183063 TECHCRUNCH 2020-5-20:
What people tend to get wrong about remote work
0.264 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182298 TECHREPUBLIC 2020-5-20:
Working from home: Why it takes a pandemic to improve work-life "fusion"
0.259 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181612 TECHREPUBLIC 2020-5-15:
More companies likely to keep employees working from home until 2021 due to COVID-19
0.253 Find similar Compare side-by-side
183000 TECHCRUNCH 2020-5-19:
Sequoia Capital’s Roelof Botha is coming to Disrupt this fall
0.249 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181548 TECHREPUBLIC 2020-5-18:
"Back to Work Accelerator" brings monitoring solutions to the office during pandemic
0.245 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182972 TECHCRUNCH 2020-5-19:
Experience marketplace Pollen lays off 69 North America staff, furloughs 34 in UK
0.242 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181625 VENTUREBEAT 2020-5-18:
Finding the balance between safety and freedom in the shadow of COVID-19
0.239 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181514 VENTUREBEAT 2020-5-15:
AI Weekly: Introducing the AI and surveillance in the age of coronavirus special issue
0.234 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182372 TECHREPUBLIC 2020-5-20:
Employee surveillance: With everyone working from home, you have to learn to trust your teams
0.234 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182342 VENTUREBEAT 2020-5-20:
How AI and remote collaboration tools could help the construction industry get back to work
0.233 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182351 TECHREPUBLIC 2020-5-19:
Telemedicine soars amid COVID-19: Will virtual healthcare be the new normal?
0.230 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182144 THEVERGE 2020-5-21:
Mark Zuckerberg on taking his massive workforce remote
0.228 Find similar Compare side-by-side
183108 TECHCRUNCH 2020-5-21:
Spotify will let employees work from home through the end of year
0.227 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181565 THENEXTWEB 2020-5-18:
Why the math behind the UK’s ‘COVID alert levels’ makes no sense
0.226 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181598 ARSTECHNICA 2020-5-18:
3 different countries, 1 result: Stay-at-home orders work
0.226 Find similar Compare side-by-side
182185 TECHREPUBLIC 2020-5-21:
"Kinetic" tech leaders needed to reinvent the enterprise
0.225 Find similar Compare side-by-side
181626 TECHREPUBLIC 2020-5-15:
Voice control: Speaking is better than swiping during the coronavirus
0.222 Find similar Compare side-by-side


ID: 182127


Date: 2020-05-18

U.S. House approves remote voting, though the tech is unclear

Congress will allow remote voting for the first time in its history, after the U.S. House approved Resolution 965 late Friday in response to the coronavirus pandemic. The measure — sponsored by Massachusetts Representative Jim McGovern — authorizes proxy voting by members for renewable periods of 45 days and allows for remote participation in committee hearings. H.R. 965 could also permanently alter the way Congress operates through a provision that establishes a bi-partisan process to explore digital voting away from Capitol Hill. Per the directive, The chair of the Committee on House Administration, in consultation with the ranking minority member, shall study the feasibility of using technology to conduct remote voting in the House, and shall provide certification…that operable and secure technology exists. Previous House rules required in person voting only. The Senate still makes decisions by recording verbal Yeas and Nays on a tally sheet. Fridays congressional action is another example of how COVID-19 is forcing every organization in the U.S. to overhaul longstanding ways of doing things, usually through a mix of digital tools. We still dont have clear details on what tech the U.S. House will use to implement both the short and longer term provisions of H.R. 965. The proxy voting arrangement will allow members to vote remotely through designated representatives on Capitol Hill — effectively a form of pinch-hitting for Congress. For remote participation in hearings, there are a range of options that could be selected — from Google Meet to Microsoft Teams. Last week, Dr. Anthony Fauci testified before the U.S. Senate using Zoom. On determining long-term means for remote voting, thats now up to the Chairperson of the Committee on House Administration —  representative Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) —  and the ranking minority member Rodney Davis (R-IL), who voted against H.R. 965. Lofgren offered a preview of how it could shape up in a statement supporting H.R. 965 late Friday: For voting on the floor, we will rely on a secure email system, coupled with member-driven, remotely-directed authorizations.  This system would use secure email for proxy votes: a solid, well known, resilient technology with very low bandwidth requirements that we understand very well from a cybersecurity standpoint. Of course, she and Republican Congressman Davis will have to find agreement on this during a time when both parties rarely agree on anything. The vote on H.R. 965 was split along party lines, with 217 Dems voting in favor and not a single Republican member supporting the measure. Why Congress isnt working remotely due to COVID-19In the past, Congress has resisted calls to allow for remote voting. There was discussion of the need for such provisions after the September 11 attacks and 2001 Anthrax attacks. These was overridden by a long time expectation that those elected to represent constituencies be physically present to vote. Over the last two months, it appeared the House might become a last holdout in the U.S. for in person only workplaces, as much of the country has shifted to tech-enabled measures for remote operations. Shortly after the coronavirus outbreak hit the U.S. in March, Congressman Eric Swalwell (D-CA) pressed a resolution with Arkansas Representative Rick Crawford (R-AR) that would allow members to participate virtually in hearings and vote remotely, under special circumstances. Image Credits: Bill Dickinson/Getty ImagesThat was nixed by House Speaker  Nancy Pelosi  who, at the time, wanted Congress to remain in session and present to pass the first coronavirus stimulus bill. Two months and nearly one hundred thousand American deaths later, it appears COVID-19 could force one of the more significant procedural changes in the Houses 231 year history. In person voting could soon be replaced with some form of two-factor authentication, digital voting. This could change longstanding patterns for how lawmakers travel, interact with constituencies, and divide their time between the Beltway and districts back home.